MERLOT Peer Review

One resource I found on MERLOT was a cyberbullying StAIR presentation. Below is my peer review and evaluation of the presentation

Quality of Content:
1. Does the software present valid (correct) concepts, models, and skills?
• Yes
2. Does the software present educationally significant concepts, models, and skills for the discipline?
• Yes
Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching-Learning Tool:
1. What stage(s) in the learning process/cycle could the materials be used?
1. Explanation or description of the topic/stating the problem
• A PowerPoint kiosk that teaches what cyberbullying is and how to prevent it.
2. Demonstration of the curriculum/exploration of the problem
• This kiosk explains the topic, provides ample examples, quizzes the learners, and asks how to handle different scenarios.
3. Practice using the curriculum/analysis of the outcomes from solving the problem
• After each video or article you are asked questions to check your learning.
4. Applying the curriculum to "new" problems/application of the outcomes to other problems
• You are asked to read through 3 different scenarios and choose how the people in the scenarios should respond.
2. What is(are) the learning objective(s)? What should students be able to do after successfully learning with the materials?
• Students are asked to take the knowledge they’ve learned about cyberbullying and create a blog post about what they’ve learned.
3. What are the characteristics of the target learner(s)
• The target learners are 5th-8th grade.
4. Does the interactive/media-rich presentation of material improve faculty and students' abilities to teach and learn the materials?
• I think students would like the ability to link to videos and webpages to get additional information.
5. Can the use of the software be readily integrated into current curriculum and pedagogy within the discipline?
• This lesson uses Microsoft PowerPoint, which can be found in most schools.
6. Can the software be used in a variety of ways to achieve teaching and learning goals?
• You could present this lesson to a whole class using a projector, or you could have individual students complete this lesson using a computer lab.
7. Are the teaching-learning goals easy to identify?
• There are no specific goals listed in the presentation.
8. Can good learning assignments for using the software application be written easily?
• Yes
Ease of Use:
1. Are the labels, buttons, menus, text, and general layout of the computer interface consistent and visually distinct?
• Yes
2. Does the user get trapped in the material?
• No
3. Can the user get lost easily in the material?
• No
4. Does the module provide feedback about the system status and the user's responses?
• Yes
5. Does the module provide appropriate flexibility in its use?
• Yes
6. Does the learning material require a lot of documentation, technical support, and/or instruction for most students to successfully use the software?
• No
7. Does the material present information in ways that are familiar for students?
• Yes
8. Does the material present information in ways that would be attractive to students?
• Yes